(no subject)

[koncupiscence]

saw king kong last night with ruckiss and camillafarfalla.

AKSLJFA@BUGS!!1

overall, i enjoyed it. i laughed, i cried, it was three hours. yes, i think it could've maybe been a bit shorter. but it was good. though i don't think i'll ever really need to see it again, whatever that says.

Comments

[an-cat-dubh.livejournal.com]

I understand that sentiment. It was good to see once, but I don't think I could watch it again regardless of how good it was.

[koncupiscence.livejournal.com]

yeah... i can't even recall any specific moments that i'd like to re-watch. it was an adventure, it was beautiful, i was moved, now i'm gonna go watch lotr for gajillioneth time.

[ruckiss.livejournal.com]

I still feel a bit itchy.

*shivers*

[koncupiscence.livejournal.com]

*HEEBIE JEEBIED OMG*

leave it to peter to take the shelob factor and up it to the next level or ten.

BLAHSDFLAKH.

[azewewish.livejournal.com]

Exactly what you said, except for the crying bit. I was all emotionally torn up, but I never actually cried. Great film, my hat's off to PJ & WETA, never need to see it again.

[koncupiscence.livejournal.com]

yep. i didn't really expect to cry, but by the end... whoosh. but other than kong, i wasn't emotionally invested in any of those characters - polar opposite of lotr on that front. but i shouldn't go comparing the two - apples and oranges creme brule, you know. bravo pj, hooray for andy, but i'm moving on.

lalalapotc2!